Tuesday 30 May 2017

Lathe Bed Way Grinder

My Chipmaster Bed shows some serious wear on ways, approximately 0,5mm, 200mm from the headstock side. The tailstock slides are slightly better, but not good enough to use as reference. between the inverted V and flats of each slide there is an unused area, i.e. non bearing surface, I used this for baseline measurements, and could use it as reference surfaces for a grinder to run on.
The lathe bed grinder, is this possible? I do not know, judging by the comments on most forums, definitely not advisable. So what do you do when the cost of transport is just not worth it, and you still want a lathe bed to original tolerance?

Scrape the Bed? the bed is hardened and although I tried it with a tungsten blade on my BIAX, it will take forever.

One youtube contributor shows a method similar to scraping, but removing small bits at a time with a small dremel tool with a cutoff disk mounted. I will keep this as my second last resort.

The Plan

My plan is to use my straight edge, mount a carriage and possibly linear slides to it, fix a adjustable grinding spindle, then traverse the carriage over the bed in sweeps with tiny increments of the spindle in 0,05 - 0,09 mm.

Grinding Theory

Next questions which come to mind are surface speeds of grinding wheel, feed rate, dept of cut, wheel geometry and hardness, to name a few.
I found this short yet informative write up.

Wheel Geometry

I have been investigating on what wheel geometry to use, flat wheel, side wheel at 45 deg, cup wheel etc, the concerns are more forces exerted on the spindle and saddle which might cause vibration. Don bailey on youtube has some good advice on side wheeling. In the end I think the geometry of the spindle fixture on the saddle will determine the wheel type. The example above shows a flat wheel used in two modes.

Saddle design

I will base the saddle design on the classic lathe layout. In addition the spindle needs to be mounted rigid and straight yet be adjustable. I have a few layouts in mind and will have to consider each carefully in context of constraints, such as geometry, and benefits such as stiffness.

Saturday 27 May 2017

Deckel FP2 Vertical Column Scraping


After numerous iterations of blueing, scraping measuring and head scratching, I placed the saddle back and did some measurements with reference to the original machined surface on the vertical columns, here the results. granite parallels where placed between the ways on the machined surface, and a straight-edge spanning over it, and finally the measurement was taken from the top of the saddle to the straight-edge which are now in the same plane.

Y Represents the distance in cm from the top of the main column body.
x(0) represents the right outer measurement (over right column) , x(1) the center between columns, and x(2) the left outer measurement( over left column). The error is not nearly as big as originally measured, but it seems like the saddle nose dives into the worn area on the right column caused by the rusting cover plate. Then climbs back out and rises on the left top column section by 0,008 mm. I have repeated the measurements a few times to be certain. More scraping work on the left upper column will bring the saddle movement back within spec. no need to cast moglice or turcite. I will probably just scrape the back gib a bit to compensate. The measurement is in line with what I measured when testing the right back gib for parallelisms to the way. 
Visualization with https://plot.ly/create/






Left Front Center Right Front
0 0.004 0 0
10 0.009 0.001 0
15 0.006 -0.002 0
20 0.003 -0.002 -0.003
25 0.002 -0.002 -0.002
30 0.002 -0.001 -0.001
35 0.003 -0.001 -0.001
40 0.004 -0.004 -0.006
45 0 -0.004 -0.008


Sleeping over it, made me think, there might be other reasons why I get the measurements.
  • it might related to leveling of the main column body. 
  • The right back gib was not mounted, which could indicate a slight tilt in the left column way
  •  The worn area on the center of right column might cause the saddle to lift the right front part when the left rear dips into the worn area.
I have redone the measurement of the column height with reference to the machined surface, and get very similar results, thus at this point I will slightly scrape the top part of the left front column and call it job done. Next step would be to start with the saddle.

Grinding attachement design


The german forum at this link has and interesting discussion on mounting flanges.

Und seeeeehr wichtig: Scheiben NIEMALS ohne die Papierzwischenlage spannen.
Und Seeeeehr wichtig: NIEMALS eine "Presspassung" für die Scheibenbohrung auf dem Aufnahmedorn verwenden. die Scheibe muss sich ganz leicht und ohne Zwang auf den Dorn schieben lassen.
Edit: Und Seeeeehr wichtig: Die Metallflansche müssen an der Scheibenanlage seitlich ausgespart sein. Das verhindert ein verspannen der Scheiben.
Wird das nicht beachtet ist eine zerspringende Scheibe schon vorprogrammiert.

Useful mounting notes, translated:
Disks should not be mounted without paper inserts (2)
Never ever use a press fit between disk and shaft, disk should have an easy slide fit onto shaft.
Metal mounting disks should have a side relief, to avoid putting irregular tension on the grinding disk. Not following this advice will certainly lead to catastrophic failure of grinding disks.
 









Tuesday 23 May 2017

3D Edge Finder, Touch probe, Digitizing Probe

Once you start milling you soon realize all work has to be referenced, easily done with a round bar with known diameter, but a lot of calculating with manual dials.
Mechanical devices like wiggler are easy to build but only work in 2D and can not interface to the DRO.
My mill came with a Heidenhain DRO VRS 760b.
dro
Not sure when they where manufactured, but it looks massive, stuffed with electronic components dating back to the late 1970's. Old but quite advanced for the its age, it supports an edge finder (kanten taster) KT120, terminating in a connector resembling a game port DA-15.
kt120
This seems like a basic tool to have , but oh my word selling on ebay for EUR 450 on a trade in of defect unit. Way too much for my hobby budget. So I have to build my own....
The idea was to start with what else than a google search on "3d touch probe diy" ...
https://www.google.com/patents/US5657549
https://www.google.com/patents/US5365673
https://www.google.com/patents/US5509211
http://www.homemetalshopclub.org/news/12/presentation_1202.pdf
http://fadedbits.com/2011/02/touchprobe/
many reads further I discovered most design's are based on a lapsed patent with three ball contacts connected in series. Soon I discovered this is quite inaccurate, and my precision OCD kicked in, there has to be a better way in using electronics to accurately measure this. The problem with the three contact points is depending on the angle of attack, the displacement until contact breaks is different.
My thinking is along the lines of amplifying the movement/acceleration with mechanical advantage, and measure with MEMS, optical, capacities or inductive.
Requirements:
  1.  Repeatability is more important than Accuracy of measurement.
  2. approach angle should not matter
  3. battery powered
  4. wireless
  5. LCD/led indicator, indicate power on and edge detected, if more accurate measuring is possible indicate measurement.
Evaluation:
  1. 3-Axis Gyro/Accelerometer IC
    Accuracy of less than 0.5 deg possible, https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/33374/choosing-an-accelerometer
    1. tan 0,5 deg = 0.00872686779 , this is a minute displacement, worth investigating  further. how will noise influence repeat ability?
  2. Opto reflective sensor
    1. displacement of 1mm easy to measure
    2. further testing required to establish repeatability
     

My Design

The body is fixed to the spindle, is houses a moveable part, which pivots on a spherical ball in the center, which locates in a tight fitting sleeve, this facilitates the measurement of small variances in horizontal and vertical plane.


Arduino Dynamic Balancer

To regrind the Chipmasters bed I will need to balance the wheel and spindle. I was thinking along the lines of using a gyro, accelerometer device like those found in your smartphone or drone, then measure displacement and rotation to identify imbalances.
This site hosts some interesting articles drkfs.net, including a balancing technique http://drkfs.net/balancedisk.htm

another device based on the above design:
http://www.turbinemuseum.de/Gasturbines/Balancing_Tool/balancing_tool.html

Balaancing a brushless motor and propeller with a similar method:
https://github.com/QuadTinnakon/Arduino-Balance-a-Brushless-Motor-and-Propeller-Balancing-/blob/master/Balance_Mega2560_V5.ino

Old Static wheel balancing device.
old balancer
schenck_dynamic_balancing_machinery

My Design

This is a fixture where the top is floating on three braided steel wire pivots. The wire is aligned to provide freedom of movement along the horizontal axis (x). Mounting a 3 axis accelerometer on the floating base should be able to measure the vibration caused by the out of balance mass of the rotating body overhead, in the x and to some lesser degree in y and z plane. I have not done any calculations on the geometry and actual vibrations expected, to be able to predict the mass required to correct the out of balance.
Dynamic Balancer v1 front.png

Take Two

Simplified, and improved design and more complete layout.
Dynamic Balancer V2 v5

Balancing a Rotating Object using an Accelerometer, type MMA2301


The setup described here is a small scale version of the wheel-balancing machines used in auto mobile tyre fitting workshops. It was required in the course of the development of an instrument with a multi-component rotating part which needed to be more or less vibration free at about 5000 rpm. Initial steps were taken to ensure that the disk was nearly balanced from the start. Each component of the rotating sub assembly were weighed at the design stage and mounted, as far as possible to balance one another about the intended axis of rotation. The result was a rotating sub-assembly which ran smoothly up to about 500 rpm but showed about 5g of vibration at 5000 rpm. The setup described here was designed to measure and correct the imbalance causing this vibration.

The Optical Tachometer


A simple optical tachometer was set up to provide a timebase for the measurements. A rectangular block of perspex, approximately 15 x 6 x 5 mm was used as the supporting element of the tachometer. To one of the small ends, an IR880 LED and an OP501 phototransistor were cemented using epoxy resin, and wired to a 5 volt supply via resistors as shown in the sketch above. The section of the motor shaft was painted matte black and attached to it longitudinally, a strip of aluminium foil about 0.3mm in width. As the motor rotated, this strip reflected light from the LED to the phototransistor once per revolution and generated an electrical pulse about 0.05 -0.1V in height, sufficient to provide a reliable trigger for an oscilloscope. The tacho signal from the collector of the phototransistor was supplied to one Y channel of a Telequipment DM63 Analogue Storage Oscilloscope, set to 50mV/division and 2mS per division on the timebase.
The motor was a high-quality brushless DC type, having a control voltage input supplied from a 10 turn potentiometer to enable good manual control over the motor speed.

The Accelerometer

The vibration caused by the out of balance mass on the rotating sub-assembly was detected and measured by a single axis solid-state accelerometer, type MMA2301. The data sheet for this device is available here.
The simple electrical configuration of this device is shown in the diagram above. It provide a voltage output proportional to the acceleration at the rate of 10mV/g. Its output was applied to a second Y channel of the DM63 Oscilloscope, set to 20mV/division.

The Measurements

The trace obtained when an out-of-balance object is rotated on the shaft is shown diagrammatically on the oscilloscope screen at the head of this page. The analogue storage facility was used to capture the trace which was then photographed. Two measurements can be taken from the resulting photographs. The more important of these is the phase interval T, in the diagram, which is a measure of the time, and hence the angle, between the tacho zero and the maximum out of balance mass. This allows the determination of the angular position of the total out of balance moment about the rotational axis. To counteract this an equivalent moment must be added to the object 180 degrees from the determined position. The oscilloscope screen photo below shows the trace obtained from the unbalanced object. The upper trace is the tacho signal showing the zero pulse. The lower trace is the accelerometer signal which has an amplitude of some 70 mV, corresponding to a vibrational acceleration of 7 g.

Calculation of the required mass.

The following is a method for obtaining an approximation to the required mass, and depends upon the assumption that the vibrational acceleration measured by the accelerometer on the base plate supporting the motor is equal to the out of balance acceleration on the rotating object. This is a reasonable approximation if there is little shock absorption on the mountings.
If the linear acceleration at the periphery of the rotating object, radius r and mass M , owing to its revolution at an angular velocity ω, is A, and the measured vibration acceleration is a, we can express the approximate relationship as:
m = a.M/r2

where mis the extra mass at the periphery. Using this equation, the additional mass was calculated and applied to the rotating sub assembly at the correct position on it periphery. Retesting the vibration amplitude demonstrated that the required mass was, in fact, twice the calculated value. When this mass was added, the result obtained showed a very small vibrational amplitude, and the rotation was smooth up to 5000 RPM. The screen photograph below shows the trace obtained.

Tuesday 16 May 2017

COLCHESTER CHIPMASTER CONTINENTAL 1974


Here I am trying to document my experience and lessons learned in restoring a Chippie to hopefully pristine condition again. I bought it from a member of the Rand Society of Model Engineers – http://www.rsme.co.za/index.php. The machine was acquired by Mitco Tool in South Africa in 1976. As can be seen pretty rough on the outside. But it did cleanup nicely. The bed has enough wear at 0,5mm for me to consider scraping or grinding. Measurement technique thanks to Keith Rucker, who runs a youtube channel and explained some nifty tricks he learned, from Richard King in his scraping classes, on machine alignment. Richard King is a Biax representative as I understand, and travels the world to teach scraping and machine reconditioning techniques. Another valuable resource is the Book “Machine tool reconditioning” by Ed Connelly. In my part of the world attending a scraping class is but a pipe dream.
So the question came up how much actual wear is on the inverted V ways if the saddle sag measures 0,5mm? Using Pythagoras formulae yields 0,353553 mm. I did not intend in going into too much detail on surface grinding at this point, but I will have to correct this. After contacting all the local engineering shops, none have a surface grinder.   And shipment of the bed 1400km to SA is not an option.
After almost completing my Deckel FP2 rebuild and having had to scrape the ways for 0,03mm of wear with an old blue BIAX scraper, I feel more confident, and the idea started growing on me, I will have to do it myself. Searching the web and finding a lot of discouragement on machining forums like practical machinist, with some posts of guys attempting a DIY, but actual results are never published. I will have to come up with a novel portable solution. I would like to target original tolerances or better.
The wandering Axeman hosts a great blog for more chippie info.
According to his age chart on  my Chippie’s serial number FCG 6459 makes it a 1974 vintage.
Bed flatness is not specified, but if I want to achieve the Headstock Alignment – Vertical spec of 0 to 0.0125 mm ( actual of 0,0025 on test charts ), I need to keep the horizontal grinding slides and spindle tolerance below 0,0125mm and to achieve 0,008838835mm on the inverted V. If I use my granite straight edge, which is accurate to within 0,001mm over 1m and working with 45 degree V ways, I would need to keep the straight edge vertical for the V grinds and inclined by 45 degrees for the flat ways.
Grind1.PNG
What do I need?
grinding spindle with less than 0,01 run-out and good balance
long reference sliding surface, granite straight edge?
rigid saddle which can be adjusted vertically in 0,01mm increments over about 10mm
horizontal adjustable diamond dressing holder which can be adjusted.
Interesting theory on surface grinding:
Great source of manuals:
I will update this blog with progress and the bed grinding attachment I plan to build.
chippy 2
One of the biggest tasks will be to get the ways and sliding surfaces back to original specifications.
chippy 204
I am planning to change the drive system back to original with the Kopp variator.
chippy 205
Most plates are in place, and will need some cleaning and a touch of paint. The speeds and feeds plate is missing so I had to recreate it. I started with images found on the web and in  the manual.
Colchester Chipmaster Feed Chart 1
If you have a plate like this lying around give me a shout… I tried enhance the below image from the manual to the level where I can use it for the photo etch process, but had no luck. So I started redrawing the artwork with Inkscape https://inkscape.org/
MetricFeeds1

Chipmaster Gear Cutting

  Calculate all the possible gear combinations for the gear selector to cut a 15TPI thread: Imperial TPI C 5 24 20 Imperial TPI ...